.jpg)
记者：若森林对安德森要价一直很高，曼城会选择埃德松（记者：若森林坚持对安德森高要价，曼城将改选埃德松）
Confirming translation and context
I’ll start by confirming the translation and then ask if the user wants the source, more context, or an analysis of feasibility.
For a quick analysis, I think it makes sense regarding the value discipline of the city. Unless Ederson leaves, they would probably only seek a replacement, keeping price sensitivity in mind. I'll keep that part succinct to avoid overwhelming the user with too much information at once.
 这是在说：如果诺丁汉森林对“安德森”的要价一直很高，曼城更可能选择继续用（或留住）埃德松。
你想要：
- 英文翻译与改写；
- 查一下这条传闻的来源与可靠性；
- 简单形势分析（曼城门将位、预算、替代选项）？ 
快速看法：这逻辑说得通——除非埃德松离队，否则曼城一般不会为门将大额溢价；若目标要价过高，他们更可能选择续留现有配置（埃德松+奥尔特加），或转向更性价比的替代方案。